Africa cannot wait for great leaders

Long-term transformation requires systems that identify, prepare and empower leaders before they reach positions of power.

Africa has no shortage of development strategies. From the African Union’s Agenda 2063 to national development plans, the continent’s ambitions for economic transformation, stronger institutions and improved human development are well established. The more difficult question is whether Africa is developing enough people capable of turning those ambitions into sustained institutional change.

Is Africa developing enough people capable of turning its development ambitions into sustained institutional change?

Too often, this question is framed as a search for exceptional individuals: visionary presidents, reforming ministers, transformative chief executives or courageous public servants. Yet Africa cannot build its future by waiting for great leaders to appear. Leadership must be cultivated deliberately.

The challenge is not simply how to train more leaders, but how to build systems that identify potential early, develop it over time, expose emerging leaders to responsibility, connect generations, reward competence and prepare institutions for succession. If Africa is serious about long-term transformation, leadership development should be treated as part of development policy itself, not only for elected office, but also across public administration, universities, business, civil society and regional organisations.

Building such systems means developing leadership capabilities long before people enter senior positions. Every generation faces different leadership demands. The generation that led much of Africa to independence had to mobilise societies around sovereignty, national identity and the building of new states. Today’s leaders operate in a faster-moving and more interdependent environment, shaped by technological disruption, demographic pressures, climate risks and intensifying geopolitical competition.

Long-term consequences are not new. What has changed is the speed, complexity and interconnectedness of many decisions, often made amid greater uncertainty and competing pressures.

This requires more than charisma or political instinct. It requires the ability to understand evidence, work across disciplines, manage organisations, listen to competing perspectives and navigate trade-offs between immediate and longer-term priorities. It also requires self-awareness and a sense of stewardship: the discipline to recognise one’s limitations, learn from failure and place institutional and public purpose above personal advancement.

The foundations of these capabilities should be developed much earlier. Schools can help cultivate critical thinking, ethical reasoning and civic responsibility. Universities must take this further by preparing students not only for employment but also to exercise professional and civic responsibility. This can include opportunities to work across disciplines, confront real societal problems, and, where appropriate, gain structured exposure to public institutions, communities and industry.

Governments can complement this by establishing competitive, merit-based early- and mid-career leadership pathways that allow promising professionals to gain experience across ministries, regulators, local government and regional institutions. Selection and progression should be transparent and depend on demonstrated capability, performance and potential rather than on seniority alone. Such exposure would also help future leaders understand how policy is made, how institutions interact and why implementation often succeeds or fails.

The principle is simple: people should encounter the realities of leadership before they inherit its authority.

Leadership development must then continue from early exposure through mentorship to deliberate succession. Africa possesses an enormous leadership resource that is often underused: the accumulated experience of previous generations. Senior public servants, academics, entrepreneurs, political leaders and civil society figures hold valuable knowledge about how institutions function, why reforms succeed or fail and how difficult decisions are negotiated. Much of this experience, however, is transferred informally, if at all.

Mentorship can help bridge that gap, but its purpose should not be to reproduce inherited practices uncritically. Strong mentorship transfers institutional memory while allowing emerging leaders to question assumptions, learn from past failures and adapt institutions to changing circumstances. It must also be connected to succession.

Institutions should deliberately identify emerging leaders, expose them to decision-making and give them progressively greater responsibility. Succession should not begin only when a leader retires, resigns or leaves unexpectedly. By then, institutions are forced to improvise. Preparing others to lead should itself be regarded as a measure of good leadership: strong leaders build teams and institutions that can function without constant dependence on them.

Nor should Africa look only to politics for its future leaders. The pathways into elected office, public administration and other sectors will necessarily differ. Many potential leaders are already working in laboratories, hospitals, universities, businesses, regulatory agencies and community organisations. Complex national challenges increasingly require people who can operate across these boundaries. Science must connect with policy, economic decisions must take account of health and social consequences, and technology must be governed alongside innovation.

Africa should not look only to politics for its potential future leaders: many already work in laboratories, hospitals, universities, businesses, regulatory agencies and community organisations

Institutions should therefore create more opportunities for movement and exchange across sectors. Africa’s diaspora can also contribute through structured mentorship, temporary appointments, advisory roles and teaching and research partnerships that shift the conversation from brain drain towards brain circulation.

These pathways can broaden Africa’s leadership pipeline, but institutions ultimately matter more than individual heroes. Even highly capable leaders will struggle in institutions that discourage independent thinking, ignore evidence, reward patronage or prioritise short-term interests. Leadership development cannot, therefore, be separated from institution-building.

It is not enough to call for cultures in which competence is rewarded, public resources are protected and constructive disagreement is possible. Institutions need systems that make these norms durable: transparent recruitment and promotion, accountability for performance and public resources, protection for professional advice and credible succession processes. Because such reforms depend on those who control recruitment, promotion and institutional rules, transparent decision-making and credible oversight are essential.      

The ultimate test of leadership is not whether one exceptional individual can transform an institution during their tenure. It is whether that institution can continue making good decisions after they have gone.

Institution-building must also include the capacity to think beyond immediate electoral, political and budget cycles. Decisions about education, infrastructure, artificial intelligence, climate resilience, demographic change and natural resources will shape African societies for decades.

Strategic foresight, scenario planning and long-term policy analysis should therefore become routine institutional capabilities across Africa rather than depend on the preferences of individual leaders. Public institutions should routinely assess not only what a decision achieves today, but what it could mean ten, twenty or thirty years from now.

A leader’s most important legacy may not be a road, a hospital, a new program or even a successful reform. It may be an institution capable of continuing to serve citizens long after that leader has left office.

Taken together, these measures make leadership development part of development policy. Africa does not lack talented people. What remains uneven are the systems for identifying talent, developing it, testing it through responsibility, connecting generations and preparing institutions for succession.

Governments, public-service institutions, universities, regional bodies, professional organisations, businesses and foundations should therefore treat leadership development as institutional infrastructure rather than as a collection of occasional workshops or short-term programs.

Leadership development needs to be recognised as part of development policy and implemented as an institutional infrastructure

This requires integrating leadership development into how people are recruited, trained, given responsibility, assessed and promoted. Simultaneously, it means creating structured pathways for emerging professionals, embedding mentorship and succession, encouraging movement across institutions and sectors, and strengthening strategic foresight.

Leadership development alone cannot overcome weak institutions or entrenched incentives. Yet stronger systems increase the likelihood that capable people are identified, prepared and entrusted with responsibility.

The continent’s transformation will take decades. Some of those who will make its most consequential decisions in the 2040s and 2050s are currently students or young professionals. Preparing them cannot begin when the crisis arrives or the vacancy appears.

Africa should not wait for great leaders. It should build the systems that produce them.

 

Image: TheDigitalArtist/Pixabay

Republication of our Africa Tomorrow articles only with permission. Contact us for any enquiries.

---